Culture, educational, homeschool, In other's words, writing

A Logophile’s Educational Musings

I really enjoy word games. Whether Words with Friends, Word Cookies, or Word Cross, they can keep me entangled and unproductive for longer than I care to admit. I love words in general, and my children have inherited many of my logophile ways. Grammar, turns of phrases, and puns are regular sources of conversation for us; as well as the origins of many idioms and axioms. Words fascinate me. More than fun or even useful, words are also powerful.

We throw them around far too carelessly, forgetting that words can be agents of uncommon inspiration or destructive demoralization. I am among the aforementioned we.  I’m not always careful with my words either. I’d like to think that as a lover of words, I’m more careful than most, but a subjective analysis isn’t worth much.

In a culture where nearly everything is dumbed down to its base level, is it any wonder that great ideas, expressed in beautiful prose, are lacking? Where does the ability to express ourselves and encourage others come from, whether verbally or in written form? If “intellectual stimulation” is gathered mostly through Twitter, television, YA fiction and Facebook blurbs, it doesn’t offer much to draw on for discussing big ideas.

Lindsay Brigham Knott examines what this means for helping students to develop as writers in her recent offering at Circe Institute’s Apiary blog.

Amongst the greatest gifts a classical school can bestow upon its students is the opportunity to become skilled in the use of words.

“Opportunity,” not “ability,” for no institution nor teacher nor curriculum can make good writers any more than one man can convert another: the student himself must labor to train his hands for the task, and pray for the Muse to animate them. But it is incumbent upon classical schools—which aim to make students more human, tend all their natural capacities into full blossom, unshackle their desires and discipline their wills towards the wise use of leisure time, and enable them to know and live “the good life,” all by nurturing them in wisdom and virtue—to commit a large portion of their and their students’ energies to word-training.

In other words, words and their usage are vitally important. A cursory glance or slightly perked ear easily reveals how words can be used to manipulate everything from our spending habit to political policies to social and cultural mores. She adds:

It’s in attempt to communicate this vision that I often begin writing classes by asking students to consider all the parts of their lives that involve words. By words we commune with family and friends who give our days meaning; by words we decree the rules and call the plays of sports that delight our bodies and imaginations; by words we advertise the commodities that flood the markets and saturate our desires; by words we scribble out daily lists of chores, assignments, groceries, goals, dreams that form us down the years; by words we struggle to illumine the murky impulses of our own mysterious souls; by words we receive God’s scriptural self-revelation and respond in prayer and praise.

The question this author poses is whether or not those of us committed to classical education are seeing the fruits of our labor as graduates from classical schools and programs are launched into the world. Do the students reflect a level of thoughtfulness in their use of language which reflects years of studying St. Augustine, Homer, or Spenser? She determines that the answer is negative, but that most of us barely notice or see this as a problem. After all:

…they made good grades in their classical schools. Their college professors compliment their uncommon ability to express individual opinions and formulate intriguing thesis statements. Their essays ruin the curve for the rest of the class. They do in fact use words well . . . in the supremely limited context of academic writing and speaking.

This dichotomy suggests that classical school students are, in fact, mastering what their schools give them opportunity to learn about using words—but that schools themselves may not be shaping those opportunities as holistically as they could. Consider: most classical schools do prioritize training in language. Indeed, many schools of the Classical Renewal so emphasize the subjects and sequence of the Trivium (grammar, logic, and rhetoric) that some onlookers may equate “classical education” with “linguistic and literary education,” consisting of lots of Latin, lots of old books, and lots of essays. But by and large, curricula and classroom instruction suggests that skill with words means merely correct grammar, proper essay structure, varied diction and syntax, and a tasteful sprinkling of rhetorical flourishes, for that is what they teach and assess.

In other words:

I wonder whether classical schools, in their laudable zeal to train students to write well, have unconsciously adopted a model of writing instruction that does not in fact cohere with their larger aims for students—humanness, rightly-formed desires, the good life, wisdom and virtue. Too often they have taken the best of the writing instruction that non-classical schools use, focusing exclusively on academic writing like persuasive essays, literary analysis, or research papers, and married it to classically-influenced content of old books and rhetorical terminology. The fruit of the union is a program that is more college preparatory than classical, and graduates whose skill with words differs from that of their peers only in the classroom.

You should read the whole thing.

What Mrs. Knott describes is the perpetual challenge homeschoolers of every stripe must overcome. For those of us who were traditionally educated, the tendency to transfer the strategies, pace and benchmarks to our kitchen tables –while using better literature- is a constant temptation. Old habits die hard and all that.

These habits, coupled with unhealthy media consumption and reading habit, don’t only create writers with less appreciation for using words well, they also fail to inoculate emerging adults with the foundational ideals necessary to counter the onslaught of propaganda and clever use of words they’ll encounter throughout their lives.

Words, read, spoken, and written, are powerful. We forget this to our peril.

7 thoughts on “A Logophile’s Educational Musings”

  1. There may be a plague of “merely correct” writing, I guess, but on the flip side, doesn’t that almost automatically beat writing that can’t handle spelling and grammar? It also strikes me that when I consider classical schools, you could theoretically just hammer down the Latin and get soulless automatons, but another great part of the equation is that the students interact with a lot of the great literature of the past.

    I guess you could get to that point by doing….well, about what I did in high school, but hopefully that great literature, hopefully to include a good dose of poetry, might help a lot. A good warning, but I’m not quite persuaded.

    Like

  2. There may be a plague of “merely correct” writing, I guess, but on the flip side, doesn’t that almost automatically beat writing that can’t handle spelling and grammar?

    Yes. Absolutely.

    It also strikes me that when I consider classical schools, you could theoretically just hammer down the Latin and get soulless automatons, but another great part of the equation is that the students interact with a lot of the great literature of the past.

    Again, we agree.

    I guess you could get to that point by doing….well, about what I did in high school, but hopefully that great literature, hopefully to include a good dose of poetry, might help a lot. A good warning, but I’m not quite persuaded.

    I can see why, in a saner world, where 3/4 of people aren’t hammering away on their keyboards via Facebook, IG, Twitter, and to a lesser degree blogs (*hi!*), your lack of concern makes sense.

    I’m only partly the way there with Mrs. Knott, frankly. Better people write with good grammar than nothing. Sure. But the use of words and understanding the use of words (especially now) is something we need to be more invested in as we teach the next generation.

    Because the people who extol the ignoble, false, and ugly have done an excellent job of twisting and manipulating their messages to make their philosophies look as if it is good, true, and beautiful.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Words, read, spoken, and written, are powerful.

    I very much agree with the “word” hypothesis from the article (well, with modifications). Even made my own 8k word list my kids review for 15-30 min daily over 10 years (6-16). It’s taken me a decade or so to create but has delivered surprising results, such as 7th graders acing college writing courses.

    I stole this idea from a physics Cal Tech physics prof who felt vocab was like learning math facts. Works for both high/low IQ students too; high because they then excel, & low because it gives them tools without much thinking. Memory is easy for kids, younger the better.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. The heart of the argument seems to be that students need to be prepared to use words thoughtfully. Maybe to learn rhetoric instead of “writing for correctness,” which many schools do–because it’s easier to circle spelling errors than it is to write a thoughtful critique of an essay. I think this is an important viewpoint because we actually do expect everyone to be rhetorically effective, whether we think of it that way or not. Every time we get mad over someone who “said the wrong thing” or we misunderstand someone because we’re taking what they said literally instead of thinking of what they probably meant, we’re getting upset because someone didn’t use rhetoric effectively, didn’t phrase their meaning in the clearest/least offensive/best possible way. And yet–I would argue that many, many people are not strong at rhetoric (I’m not perfect, either!). So it’s like we’re holding everyone to a sort of impossible standard.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. MB: …you could just hammer down the Latin and get soulless automatons, but another great part of the equation is that the students interact with a lot of the great literature of the past.

    Or music! Watching and learning about the history of this piece is the only time I regret not learning/teaching my kids Latin… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3v9unphfi0

    Liked by 1 person

  6. And yet–I would argue that many, many people are not strong at rhetoric (I’m not perfect, either!). So it’s like we’re holding everyone to a sort of impossible standard.
    I agree that we can fall into the trap of holding everyone to an impossible standard. Classical education types tend to have very high standards.
    Heaven knows I have a tendency to lack appropriate tact when I am writing. I’m working on it. Somewhat, LOL.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. @ SMK:

    I have enjoyed watching our kids grapple with Latin. And learn Christmas and Easter hymns in Latin as well.

    Of course, if I had to be the one to teach it to them, they would never have been exposed to it at all.

    Like

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.